Vol. 24, No. 6 - November/December 2024

IN THIS ISSUE: low R-squareds, 2025 European DOE User Meeting, wickedly smart beer boffin, and more

FAQ

R-Squareds too low for useful predictive model?

Original question from a Senior Application Development Engineer / Lean Sigma Blackbelt:
“My Fit Statistics only give me a 0.25 raw R-Squared and 0.25 Adjusted R-Squared. Why would I trust anything with R-Squareds that low? Yet my Stat-Ease software says ‘this model can be used to navigate the design space.’ Really?”


Answer:
First off, shift your focus slightly on R-Squareds (which are a bit low for a designed experiment): Disregard the raw one, pay some attention to the one that’s adjusted and use the Predicted R-Squared as your bottom line on adequacy of fit. For short-and-sweet breakdown on these three ‘flavors’ of R-Squared, see this Stat-Ease blog.


Based on the screen shots of the ANOVA and fit statistics you provided, I agree with software’s take that this model might be useful—the p-value being very significant and adequate precision high—well above our guideline of 4, which triggers the positive review. I’ve often seen R-squareds as low as yours from models that did prove to be useful. This happens when with highly variable results, such as one might encounter with crude measurements, poorly controlled processes, people-dependent systems and so forth. Send me your file for a more thorough look. Otherwise, if the conclusions seem sensible, be sure to confirm them with follow up runs.


Further details (provided along with the data file):

“For what it’s worth, this is not a formal DOE—I imported existing data. There's a lot of missing responses (which doesn't help) due to the data coming from various sources throughout the plant. Even so, I hope to get something meaningful out of it.”


Follow-up answer after getting the rest of the story:

OK, I see what you are up to now. That explains the low R-squareds. Looking at Evaluation, Results for Model Terms, the quality of this existing data is not too bad based on the VIFs (variance inflation factors). It’s far better than the VIFs for Stat-Ease software’s tutorial case on historical data (a worse-case example). My feeling is that there is a good chance that you will find the results useful, despite it being an unplanned “experiment.” Time will tell.


(Learn more about model-fit statistics by enrolling in the next Mixture Design for Optimal Formulations and/or Modern DOE for Process Optimization workshop.)

EVENTS


Stat-Ease and Science Plus Group (Netherlands) will present the 2025 European DOE User Meeting in Amsterdam on June 18-20. This is your chance to network, increase your DOE knowledge, learn from other's successes and challenges, and enjoy some sightseeing. For more details on the impressive list of activities for this 8th Stat-Ease user gathering in Europe, see the 2025 meeting site. Please fill out this interest form to express interest speaking, learn more about the 2025 European DOE User Meeting schedule as it develops and be alerted when registration opens. We hope to see you in Amsterdam!


Do you need a speaker on DOE for a learning session within your company or professional society at regional, national, or international levels? If so, please get back to me.

ONLINE LEARNING

Sharpen up your DOE skills with a mix of free and paid training: whatever fits your business needs.


Comprehensive DOE courses Online instructor-led learning


Prices go up on January 1 to $1325* for the MDOE and $1225* for the MIX.


*Only $149 for students, faculty, or researchers at an accredited academic institution. Click here to qualify.


See this web page for the complete schedule of upcoming Stat-Ease courses. To enroll in the workshop that suits you best, click Register on that webpage, or click here to contact us.


If you lead a group of six or more colleagues, save money and customize content via a private workshop. For a quote, please contact us.


Free webinars Sign up to take advantage


Click here to view the times, descriptions and registration links for all upcoming live webinars. Sign up now to advance your DOE know-how!


On-Demand Videos

By the way, our Statistics Made Easy By Stat-Ease YouTube channel provides a free library of highly educational recorded webinars covering a wide variety of DOE tools. It offers videos at all levels—from those new to DOE on up. Take advantage!

INFO


The October 2024 issue of The Journal of Plastic Film and Sheeting provides tips by me for "Simple-comparative experiments done right.”


This November the Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology published an update authored by me and my colleague Martin Bezener of their entry on “Design of Experiments.” See our manuscript here. Special thanks to Arved Harding and Paul Prew for their thorough review and excellent suggestions.

BLOGS


StatsMadeEasy

My wry look at all things statistical and/or scientific with an engineering perspective.


Stat-Ease Blog

Great tips from the Stat-Ease team for making DOE easy, for example, this recent post by me on "Perfecting pound cake via mixture design for optimal formulation.”

Feel free to get back to me via [email protected] with further questions or comments: I would really appreciate hearing from you!

All the best,

Mark J. Anderson, PE, CQE, MBA
Engineering Consultant, Stat-Ease, Inc.
www.linkedin.com/in/markstat/

QUOTE OF THE DAY

He possessed a wickedly fertile imagination and more energy and focus than a St. Bernard in a snowstorm. An obsessive observer, counter, cyclist, and cricket nut, the self-styled brewer had a sizzle for invention, experiment, and the great outdoors.

Stephen Ziliak speaking about William Sealy Gosset in “Retrospectives: Guinnessometrics: The Economic Foundation of ‘Student's’ t”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 22, No. 4 (Fall, 2008), pp. 199-216.


Stat-Ease, Design-Expert and Statistics Made Easy are registered trademarks of Stat-Ease, Inc.


Circulation:
Over 2500 worldwide