
 Issue: Volume 2, Number 4
  Date: April 2002
  From: Mark J. Anderson, Stat-Ease, Inc. 
  
  Here's another set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) about doing design of 
  experiments (DOE), plus alerts to timely information and free software updates. 
  If you missed previous DOE FAQ Alerts, go to the links below. 
  Feel free to forward this newsletter to your colleagues. They can subscribe 
  by going to http://www.statease.com/doealertreg.html. 
   
I offer the following links as cold 
  appetizers:
  
  http://nsidc.org/news/press/larsen_B/2002.html 
  shows with images and movies how an ice shelf the size of Rhode Island (larger 
  than Luxembourg!) broke off from Antarctica this winter. As a resident of the 
  frozen far north of the mainland portion of the USA in the middle of a continent, 
  I can't get too upset about ice melting and oceans rising, but I imagine it's 
  unsettling for many people on this planet. In any case, this will stimulate 
  discussion on the reality of global warming and its causes.
http://www.peepresearch.org/nitrogen.html 
  explains why Peeps cannot be found in Polar regions. I think all the Peeps came 
  to my home for the recent Easter holiday. They won't last long!
Here's what I cover in the body text 
  of this DOE FAQ Alert (topics that delve into statistical detail are rated "X"):
  
  1. FAQ: Why equations in actual terms provide misleading 
  information about the relative effects 
  2. Address alert: Stat-Ease is moving to a new suite (#480)
  3. Simulation alert: Try your hand at baking better pizza
  4. Reader feedback: A look at DOE for non-manufacturing 
  areas such as marketing (see Volume 2, Number 3, March 2002, FAQ #1)
  5. Info alert: Link to the latest review of Design-Expert® 
  software
  6. Workshop alert: Tuition has been reduced for private 
  DOE workshops presented at your site
  
  PS. Quote for the month - Knowledge knows no boundaries.
   
1 - FAQ: Why equations in actual 
  terms provide misleading information about the relative effects
  
-----Original Question-----
  
  From: Taiwan
  
  "Both coded and actual factor equations [shown below] 
  give the same predictions; but why do the A, B and C factors show the effect 
  to the response in different ways? For Final Equation in Terms of Coded Factors, 
  the response was inversely proportional to these three factors, while for Final 
  Equation in Terms of Actual Factor, the response was proportional to these three 
  factors." 
Final Equation in Terms of Coded Factors:
Y = 12.99 - 0.93A - 2.06B - 0.24C + 0.009375A^2 - 0.38B^2 - 0.14C^2 - 1.19AB-0.22 AC-0.18BC
Final Equation in Terms of Actual Factors:
Y = 7.01 + 84.43A 
  + 10.71B + 0.20C + 13.09A^2 - 6.29B^2 - 0.001596C^2 - 180.89AB - 0.87AC - 0.076BC
    
Answer (from Pat Whitcomb, consultant 
  and principal of Stat-Ease):
  
  "To get the actual equation, replace each term in the coded equation with 
  its coding formula*: 
  
  Coded = (Actual value - mean)/(range/2)
For example, the coding formula for factor A [in this case] is:
Acoded = (Aactual - (0.028 + 0.082))/((0.082 - 0.028)/2)
Substituting the coding formulas 
  for all factors in the coded equation creates many changes. The impact depends 
  on the class of terms:
  
  - linear term replacement results in new linear coefficients and corrections 
  to the intercept 
  - quadratic term replacement results in new quadratic coefficients and a further 
  corrections to the intercept
  - interaction term replacement results in new interaction coefficients, further 
  corrections to the each main effect in the interaction and more corrections 
  to the intercept.
The corrections from the interactions 
  can be large and opposite in sign from the linear terms. They can change the 
  sign on the linear terms. This is what happened to you. Always use the coded 
  equation to explain effects. Although both equations give the same predictions; 
  only the coded coefficients are proportional to the observed effect. This is 
  what provides the motivation to code factors in the first place." 
  
  *[Refer to the section on "Coding 
  factor levels" in the "Engineering Statistics Handbook" at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pri/section7/pri7.htm.)
(Learn more about developing good 
  predictive models by attending the "Response Surface Methods for Process 
  Optimization" workshop
  (see http://www.statease.com/clas_rsm.html).]
2 - Address alert: Stat-Ease is moving to a new suite (#480)
Over the next week or so, Stat-Ease 
  will move up from its current suite on the first floor to a larger one on the 
  4th floor of the same building. Our new address is:
  
  Stat-Ease, Inc.
  2021 E. Hennepin Ave., Suite 480
  Minneapolis, MN 55413-2726
Note that the last four digits of 
  our zip code changed along with the suite number. Our telephone, fax and e-mail 
  remain the same but due to movement of lines there may be a short disruption 
  in these communications. Thank you for your patience. 
  
  Next month I will provide photographs 
  of our new office area. The most important addition will be a training room 
  for our computer-intensive workshops.
3 - Simulation alert: Try your 
  hand at baking pizza
  
  Bill Hathaway of MoreSteam.com 
  offers a new simulation* for you to try. He says "Here is a sneak peek 
  at the latest DOE animation: http://www.gramtel.net/customers/moresteam/index.html (Update 3/07: Link no longer available ). 
  I have not yet developed an introduction, but the basic story will be about 
  a high-end pizza delivery chain using wood-fired ovens that is getting complaints 
  about taste and crust consistency. They want to be able to use cheaper flour 
  (not imported from Italy) and have trouble consistently getting Hickory wood 
  to fuel the ovens. So they want to know how these factors (and others) effect 
  taste and consistency."
Feel free to try your hand at making 
  better pizza. Then let me know what you think. Feel free to make suggestions 
  on modifications. I will pass your comments on to Bill. 
  
  *(The pizza-making simulation is the second one developed by MoreSteam.com. 
  In my January e-mail I provided a temporary link to a beta version of a simulator 
  that shoots virtual boulders from a trebuchet. Eventually, Bill hopes to put 
  several simulators together for use in their Six Sigma training on DOE. Stat-Ease 
  has no financial interest in MoreSteam.com, but they use "DOE Simplified: 
  Practical Tools for Effective Experimentation" (co-authored by me and my 
  partner Pat Whitcomb) as their DOE textbook, which comes with a free trial copy 
  of Design-Ease® software. See http://www.statease.com/doe_simp.html 
  for details on this book.)
   
4 - Reader feedback: A look at 
  DOE for non-manufacturing areas such as marketing (see Volume 2, Number 3, March 
  2002, FAQ #1)
  
-----Original Message-----
  
  From: Fred
  Re: DOE FAQ Alert, Volume 2, Number 3 - March, 2002 (see http://www.statease.com/news/faqalert2-3.html)
"Thank you for sharing! I recently completed Six Sigma Black Belt training. The training included DOE at a level that gave us just enough information to be dangerous. I am very interested in the application of DOE to service industries. As Drucker has said, "All companies are service companies, some of them also produce products." More than 70% of our economy is currently a service economy within which I have focused most of my quality management experience. I am struggling with the complexity of DOE and whether it is provides greater value than other methodologies in delivering quantitative understanding of key variables in service industries.
FYI, I am on your mailing list because I attended one of Stat-Ease's seminars at an ASQ [American Society of Quality] conference probably 6-7 years ago. I am truly thankful for your generous sharing of your knowledge. Thanks for your help."
Answer:
  
  Fred, I'd be surprised if you can find any methodology other than DOE that will 
  do better at delivering quantitative understanding of key variables in service 
  industries, particularly the interactions that almost certainly affect the outcome. 
  The interactions are the gold nuggets you want to screen out with the aid of 
  two-level factorial designs. Stat-Ease will be leading a session on "The 
  Use of DOE in Non-Manufacturing Environments" at the Spring Research Conference 
  of the Quality and Productivity (Q&P) section of the American Statistical 
  Association (ASA) on June 5-7 in Phoenix, Arizona. It will be a great opportunity 
  to hear how DOE and other statistical tools can be used to enhance productivity 
  and improve the quality of products and services. For more details, see http://ceaspub.eas.asu.edu/ie/2002qprc.htm (no longer available). 
  
5 - Info alert: Link to the latest 
  review of Design-Expert software
  
The April 1 edition of "Analytical 
  Chemistry" features a review of Design-Expert software, version 6. It's 
  posted on our site: http://www.statease.com. 
  Look for the icon of the magazine. Click on this or the text "Design, Analyze, 
  and Optimize with Design-Expert" to see the complete article written by 
  Katherine T. Alben from the New York State Department of Health. She provides 
  a fair assessment of how our software performs for the specific applications 
  of interest to the readership of this particular publication. However, it gives 
  anyone interested in doing DOE an idea of what Design-Expert will do for them.
6 - Workshop alert: Tuition has been reduced for private DOE workshops presented at your site
See http://www.statease.com/clas_pub.html for schedule and site information on all Stat-Ease workshops open to the public. To enroll, click the "register online" link at our web site or call Stat-Ease at 1.612.378.9449. If spots remain available, bring along several colleagues and take advantage of quantity discounts in tuition.
If you've got a group of 6 or more professionals that need DOE training, consider bringing in an expert from Stat-Ease to teach a private class at your site. We recently reconfigured our pricing to make smaller classes more cost-effective. Call Sherry Klick, Stat-Ease Workshop Coordinator, at 612.378.9449, extension 18 to get a quote.
I hope you learned something from this issue. Address your questions and comments to me at:
Mark J. Anderson, PE, CQE
  Principal, Stat-Ease, Inc. (http://www.statease.com)
  Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
PS. Quote for the month - Knowledge knows no boundaries.
"Science knows no country, 
  because knowledge belongs to humanity, and is the torch which illuminates the 
  world. Science is the highest personification of the nation because that nation 
  will remain the first which carries the furthest the works of thought and intelligence."
  
  - Louis Pasteur
   
Trademarks: Design-Ease, Design-Expert and Stat-Ease are registered trademarks of Stat-Ease, Inc.
Acknowledgements to contributors: 
  
  
  - Students of Stat-Ease training and users of Stat-Ease software
  - Fellow Stat-Ease consultants Pat Whitcomb and Shari Kraber (see http://www.statease.com/consult.html 
  for resumes)
  - Statistical advisor to Stat-Ease: Dr. Gary Oehlert (http://www.statease.com/garyoehl.html)
  - Stat-Ease programmers, especially Tryg Helseth (http://www.statease.com/pgmstaff.html)
  - Heidi Hansel, Stat-Ease marketing director, and all the remaining staff.
Interested in previous FAQ DOE Alert e-mail newsletters? To view a past issue, choose it below.
#1 - Mar 01, #2 - Apr 01, #3 - May 01, #4 - Jun 01, #5 - Jul 01 , #6 - Aug 01, #7 - Sep 01, #8 - Oct 01, #9 - Nov 01, #10 - Dec 01, #2-1 Jan 02, #2-2 Feb 02, #2-3 Mar 02, #2-4 Apr 02 (see above)